An Explainable AI Framework for Identifying Transferable Sustainable Urban Mobility Policies: Evidence from Istanbul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65069/jessd21202619Keywords:
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), Sustainable urban mobility, Policy transferability, Decision support systems, Urban transport planningAbstract
Cities increasingly look to the experiences of other urban areas when designing policies to promote sustainable mobility. However, the transfer of transport policies across cities is rarely straightforward: interventions that perform well in one context may produce substantially different outcomes elsewhere because of differences in urban form, population density, socioeconomic conditions, transport systems, travel behaviour and institutional characteristics. Conventional benchmarking approaches often identify high-performing cities but provide limited guidance on whether their policies are transferable to a specific target context. This study proposes an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework for identifying sustainable urban mobility policies that are potentially transferable to Istanbul, Türkiye. The framework combines cross-city benchmarking, machine-learning-based identification of comparable urban contexts, and explainable modelling of the relationship between city characteristics, policy interventions and observed mobility outcomes. Istanbul is positioned as the target city, while a set of international cities provides the empirical basis for identifying potentially transferable policy interventions. Rather than ranking cities according to overall performance, the proposed approach evaluates the contextual similarity between cities and investigates whether policies associated with positive mobility outcomes under particular urban conditions are likely to be relevant to Istanbul. Explainable AI techniques are used to identify the characteristics that contribute most strongly to policy-transferability predictions, thereby providing transparency about why a particular intervention is considered more or less suitable for the Istanbul context. The resulting framework provides a systematic approach for moving from descriptive international benchmarking towards context-sensitive policy learning and decision support. The study contributes to the sustainable urban mobility literature by demonstrating how explainable AI can support the identification and assessment of policy transferability while recognising the contextual dependence of urban transport interventions. The findings are intended to provide evidence-based guidance for Istanbul's sustainable mobility transition and a methodological framework that can subsequently be applied to other cities seeking to learn from international policy experience.
References
Banister, D., & Hickman, R. (2013). Transport futures: Thinking the unthinkable. Transport Policy, 29, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.005
Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
Marsden, G., & Stead, D. (2011). Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence. Transport Policy, 18(3), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.007
Glaser, M., Bertolini, L., te Brömmelstroet, M., Blake, O., & Ellingson, C. (2022). Learning through policy transfer? Reviewing a decade of scholarship for the field of transport. Transport Reviews, 42(5), 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2003472
McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
Stead, D. (2012). Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2011.644084
Canitez, F. (2020). Transferring sustainable urban mobility policies: An institutional perspective. Transport Policy, 90, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.02.005
Bulkeley, H. (2006). Urban sustainability: Learning from best practice? Environment and Planning A, 38(6), 1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37300
Goodspeed, R. (2015). Smart cities: Moving beyond urban cybernetics to tackle wicked problems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu022
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1135–1144). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874
Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable machine learning: A guide for making black box models explainable (2nd ed.). Lulu Press.
Canitez, F., Alpkokin, P., & Kiremitci, S. T. (2020). Sustainable urban mobility in Istanbul: Challenges and prospects. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(4), 1148–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.07.005
Canitez, F. (2024). Sustainable urban mobility in Istanbul: Transition and planning. Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science, 1. https://doi.org/10.59543/jidmis.v1i.11269
Marsden, G., Frick, K. T., & May, A. D. (2011). How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America. Transport Policy, 18(3), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.006
Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2019). A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(5), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236009
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
Bertolini, L. (2020). From "streets for traffic" to "streets for people": Can street experiments transform urban mobility? Transport Reviews, 40(6), 734–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1761907











All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the